"The 355" Review: You've Seen This...Done Better
The only thing refreshing about The 355 is an all female lead ensemble cast. It has the bones of a decent spy film but is missing the muscle and sinew to bring it all together. You’ve seen this before and done so much better!
The film starts with a military team crashing in on the house of a warlord. The shootout ends with one lone agent, Luis (Edgar Ramirez) retrieving a drive that has the power to take planes out of the sky and shut down power grids. It’s a weapon of mass destruction that will start World War III and that’s all you need to know because how it functions doesn’t really make much sense. Thus we have our McGuffin (an object in a movie that everyone wants) that the film keeps as the center.
We’re slowly introduced to our cast of characters. Mace (Jessica Chastain) and Nick (Sebastian Stan) work for the CIA and are going after the drive when Marie (Diane Kruger) steps in to get it. As not to spoil the plot, one by one other agents from agencies around the world come in to the fold. Khadijah (Lupita Nyong’o), Graciela (Penelope Cruz), and Lin Mi Sheng (Bingbing Fan) all step up willingly or unwillingly to help stop possible annihilation of the world.
Character development is poor in a genre that demands it. It takes smart writing to We’re given scenes that inform us that Khadijah has a boyfriend and Marie is a lone wolf trying to evade the shadow of her father’s past, but they don’t have any depth to them. The movie plays out like a beat sheet from a first draft of a better espionage flick. As much as I love Jessica Chastain, she is gifted two fight scenes that seem to go on far longer than needed in this film. Some of the choreography plays out like a one size fits all when it should have played to each particular character’s strengths and physicality.
Co-writer/director Simon Kinberg has good and great films to his producer credits: Logan, Deadpool, Deadpool 2, Chappie, and more. Producing is a different skill than directing though. This film lacks direction. The best action directors can get the audience acquainted with the setting and space a scene is being shot in with an establishing wide-shot and then push in on action. There are so many times where characters enter a setting but seem to have magically appeared in a space due to poor camera direction and editing.
The 355 has the formula of a spy film but lacks needed elements to make the equation add up to a satisfying outcome. The cast have given us memorable performances in the past, but this will be a film that we quickly forget about and that they were involved in. It may be worthy of a Netflix night, but definitely not worth getting out in these COVID streets to see in theaters!
Rating: D+
"It Chapter Two" Review
It Chapter Two gives us the conclusion to the Losers story. The film goes big and tries to cram 900 pages of material into its nearly three hour run time. The transition from childhood to adulthood can be tough, and certainly showing that in the sequel to 2017’s It was a difficult task for director Andy Muschietti. His efforts have to be commended. However, with length and structure issues, this doesn’t hit the mark of its predecessor and might wind up being forgotten once you’ve left the theaters much like leaving the town of Derry.
Jumping off with a hate crime towards a homosexual couple, the film gives its first foreshadowing of what you’re about to see: intense setups with questionable or predictable payoffs. After a young man is dismembered by Pennywise (Bill Skarsgard), and once Mike Hanlon (Isaiah Mustafa) hears about the latest murder over a police scanner, he quickly calls the gang back to Derry to finish what they set out to do. Mike’s call to Bill (James McAvoy), Beverly (Jessica Chastain), Ben (Jay Ryan), Richie (Bill Hader), Eddie (James Ransone) and Stanley (Andy Bean) sets off a chain reaction of fear reentering their lives before returning home.
Upon arriving back in Derry, the group quickly falls back into the friendships they left behind 27 years prior. The narrative is pretty straightforward from there. They have a job to do, and there’s an inventive way in which the internal clock on the group’s decision to carryout their mission is employed. Each character has their own moment to reconnect with their childhood fears and It, which is part of the reason for the bloating of the film. In fact, the film is light on the scares this time around in exchange for humor and the exploration of what it takes to overcome fear. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but its execution is fumbled in some stories.
The casting here is well suited. Bill Hader is stand out as Richie! From the moment he enters the frame, he embodies the role with a scene stealing richness that has to be applauded. (I doubt It: Chapter Two would receive any awards, but you could certainly make a case for Hader’s performance.) While we’re used to Jessica Chastain being a leading woman with a presence, she’s able to shrink herself enough to be one of the gang in a way that really works. It’s a shame that Skarsgard doesn’t get to do a lot with Pennywise in regard to screen time, but when he’s on the screen his performance is masterful.
Don’t get me wrong, Chapter Two has nice moments. Cinematographer, Checco Varese, is able to tap into our fears with the way he uses light in scenes. A lightning bug lights up Pennywise’s face in one scene, while the ugly fluorescent and neons in a fun house light another. Certainly the suspense and hair-raising moments of facing your fear is there. With sound being a huge component of creating scares, the sound department deserves their credit as well. It’s the quiet moments followed by the crescendo of a monsters footsteps getting closer and closer that really puts you in the zone.
Ultimately, this sequel doesn’t match the quality of the film before it due to the way the child ensemble masterfully handled the material and the fact that things that go bump in the night is a lot scarier when children are involved. There’s something about the way it feels more believable because we can remember when our imaginations ran wild and the friendly clown at the circus looked more like a threat then a fun time. That said, seeing the story conclude is much more satisfying this time around than the 90s mini-series.
Rating: B-
"Dark Phoenix" Review: Bring the Reboot Already
The real hero in Dark Phoenix is Hans Zimmer. His score elevates the film to a darker, more somber mood. It’s just unfortunate that the writing doesn’t quite match the composition, because if it had, this would be an excellent final bow!
The X-Men have elevated themselves to friends of humanity thanks to Professor Charles Xavier’s (James McAvoy) crafting. After a mission to space goes awry, the team is sent up to retrieve the astronauts. Of course, no mission can go perfectly and rather than letting the solar flare hit her team, Jean Grey (Sophie Turner) absorbs it. Fortunately, she doesn’t die, but unfortunately, it wasn’t a solar flare she absorbed either. As time proves, it’s something more powerful.
This franchise is known to have horrible or half baked villains. Enter Vuk (Jessica Chastain). I wish I could tell you what she is and the depth of her power, but the movie didn’t tell me. So all I know is that she’s an alien life form who came to Earth with what was left of her fledgling empire and took the body of a bleach blonde woman. Their goal is to retrieve the power that went in to Jean, rebuild on Earth and they will stop at nothing to get it.
Where Dark Phoenix soars is in the action sequences. Seeing certain characters’ power on display is entertaining. Magneto (Michael Fassbender) shines with some of the sheer might he possesses. Nightcrawler (Kodi Smit-McPhee) gets to go ham for a moment of line of sight teleportation at it’s finest. The climactic train sequence is definitely of note.
The problem that we’ve come to expect with these films is its character development. You just don’t care. Jean’s backstory is shown, but her family is nothing more than a setup. Quite frankly, for this to be the classic ascension of Jean to the Phoenix, she barely gets to do much on screen. There was an opportunity to make her really dark, but that didn’t happen. They could have put her full power on display. She can wipe out planets in the comics for goodness sake! Instead, you could call her the Accidental Phoenix in this film because many of the bad things she does aren’t necessarily on purpose. They come from an “oops I did it again” motive. Wins and losses are just beats on a screenwriter’s page here. The big bad Vuk is certainly just an antagonist in the film whose team seems invincible without explanation.
I’ll give co-writer/director Simon Kinberg credit for trying here. This was an effort in the right direction. The tone felt right, the costume design tried, the cast tried, Hans Zimmer infused his superhuman score, but alas, they just couldn’t get this up the hill of good filmmaking. Did I mention Hans Zimmer’s score is awesome? It’s entertaining, but if you wait to catch it when it’s streaming you’ll probably do yourself and your wallet a favor this weekend!
Rating: C-
"The Martian" Review
Space seems to be having a moment. It’s always been there, in real life and in the movies, but it seems 2013’s “Gravity” took space to a whole new level cinematically. If “Gravity” was Alfonso Cuaron’s call to the final frontier, The Martian is Ridley Scott’s response and an attempt to reclaim his territory after 2012’s not so critically acclaimed “Prometheus”. Mix in Christopher Nolan’s “Interstellar” (2014) and we’ve got ourselves a little trinity of (recent) epic space dramas. “The Martian" stands out for its own reasons, but it also fits right in.
Astronaut Mark Watney (Matt Damon) is all alone. Left behind on Mars after being separated from his crew during an emergency evacuation, Mark is presumed dead by his fellow crew mates and NASA. This all changes when satellite images from Mars prove Mark is very much alive and somehow surviving on the barren planet. The rescue mission begins, but it will be no easy feat. Time, funding and Mars’ atmosphere are all working against every effort to bring Mark home.
“The Martian” essentially takes place in three different locations. There is Mark’s Mars, a vast rust-colored landscape captured through sweeping extreme wide shots. Next, there’s Planet Earth, which is essentially the various offices and airplane hangars of NASA. And finally, there is space — where Mark’s crew is aboard a shuttle, completing their next mission. This separation works in favor of the film in that we stay in each area just long enough to build a decent amount of anticipation for our return to the next location. This is especially important considering the isolation of Damon’s performance on Mars. With no one to interact with, Damon’s Mark is a one-man show. He cracks jokes, airs his frustrations and explores his surroundings all by himself. While Damon is fun to watch, Matt Damon all by himself does not a movie make. The plot points presented in the other two locations (NASA and the shuttle) give Mark’s solo mission the tension it needs to move forward.
A major setback for Mark on Mars eventually creates a sense of much-needed urgency for the film and for Mark’s rescue mission. Mark has been able to “science the sh*t” out of his time on the planet, but in the end his stay on Mars becomes a life or death situation. A cooky, so-crazy-it-could-work plan is playfully delivered by a nerded-out Donald Glover and NASA is given the choice to either abandon Mark or put the lives of his crew members in danger in order to rescue him.
For an almost two and a half hour long film, The Martian does provide enough thrills and nerd-talk to satisfy the space movie lover in all of us. And on a much deeper level, there is some interesting commentary on our society’s dependence on technology — Mark is presumed dead because the technology on his suit fails to communicate his vital signs to his team — which would make for a fantastic college paper. Personally though, Armageddon still stands as this reviewer’s top film about space.